Home

Quality (ISO 9001)

Environmental (ISO 14001)

Health and Safety (OHSAS 18001)

Food Safety (ISO 22000)

Information Security Management (ISO27001)

Business Continuity (BS 25999)

BAFE (SP203)

TSA Code of Practice

Alarm Receiving Centre (BS 5979)

  • Consulting

  • Auditing

CCTV Control Room (BS 7958)

Vetting and Barring

Training

NSI Approval / Certification

Risk Management

Technical Audits

Security Audits

Download Team Viewer

Support

 

Remedial Action

There is often a lot of confusion surrounding remedial actions. Whilst this is not necessarily a problem in terms of rectifying problems, a clear understanding of the tools in the toolbox may lead to a better philosophy when looking at Continual Improvement.

There are four different types of remedial action:

Action When to apply it Description

Correction

After something has gone wrong

Immediate remedial action is necessary to rectify the specific instances of nonconformity. This could be any type of activity at all, but probably involves re-work, repair, replacement or refund.

Corrective Action

After something has gone wrong

Remedial action is necessary to investigate, identify and eliminate the root cause(s) that allowed the nonconformity in the first place. This probably involves rewriting processes or technical manuals, re-training personnel, implementing better controls and monitoring or adjusting unrealistic objectives.

Preventive Action

Nothing has gone wrong yet, but a weakness has been identified that could lead to a nonconformity in the future

Remedial action is necessary to investigate, identify and eliminate the root cause(s) that permit this weakness in the first place. This probably involves rewriting processes or technical manuals, re-training personnel, implementing better controls and monitoring or adjusting unrealistic objectives.

Improvement

Nothing has gone wrong yet and nothing is going to go wrong. Everything is working as predicted.

New technology, improved training methods, better methodology, changes to interdependent process, regulatory changes, better communication methods, improvements to the work environment, additional or improved resources, etc, all indicate that an improvement could be made that would produce the same results faster and cheaper with more compliance, or produce better results for the same time and money input.

It can be deduced from the above that an organization that is constantly striving to implement Improvements when there is nothing wrong (at the moment) will have less things go wrong in the future, will stay ahead of the game in terms of profitability and compliance and will generally move steadily towards a greater level of Corporate Social Responsibility.

Conversely, an organization that does not take the opportunity to improve of its own accord will move steadily away from a greater level of Corporate Social Responsibility with all of the wasted time, effort and money that that entails. It may be worse than this in that the second organization is jeopardizing its position in the marketplace and ultimately, its very existence.

 

  Go to our 'Contact Us' page Request further information or request a member of our staff to call you for a no-obligation chat Support Send an email to EQM with your feedback  

 

 

Website designed and created at GALLOWEB LTD